The Padres hope so. They signed Jon Garland to a 1-year, $4.7 million deal (plus more potentially) today, giving them a pitcher that will fit like a glove in their monstrosity of a ballpark.
I've heard numerous people call Garland "league-average", and I suppose that could be true. His last 3 ERA+s? 111, 91, 111. Not bad, not great, which I suppose does make him league-average.
However, I look at his K to BB ratios over the last 3 years (1.79, 1.53, 1.72) and I don't see a league-average pitcher. But, he's comfortably in the NL now, in the best pitcher's park the game offers.
There simply isn't much to say here. San Diego spent some money--all the poor teams are doing it, just ask Oakland, Pittsburgh and Florida--and they spent it wisely, I guess.
Garland doesn't have the downside risk of Ben Sheets--but he also doesn't have the upside. He's a 4.30-ish ERA pitcher in the weaker league. Perhaps he jumps out to a nice start, wins some games and hits the break with about a 3.70 ERA. Could San Diego flip him to a contender? Absolutely.
They didn't spend too much, and they aren't expecting a whole lot. Jon Garland's a decent pitcher, and he's being paid like one. I wish there was more to say, but alas.
Adam wishes he could say more. He knows you can say all you want, and he'd like to hear it adamdadkins@gmail.com.
.jpg)
0 comments:
Post a Comment